4 found
Order:
  1.  59
    A Reasoned Argument Against Banning Psychologists' Involvement in Death Penalty Cases.Stanley L. Brodsky, Tess M. S. Neal & Michelle A. Jones - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (1):62-66.
  2.  8
    The Gold Standard and the Pyrite Principle: Toward a Supplemental Frame of Reference.Stanley L. Brodsky & Bronwen Lichtenstein - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  39
    Undue influence or ensuring rights?: Attorney presence during forensic psychology evaluations.Robert J. Cramer & Stanley L. Brodsky - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (1):51 – 60.
    Forensic psychologists face a variety of ethical issues in conducting evaluations. One such issue is attorney presence during a forensic evaluation. In forensic evaluations, it is necessary to use standardized procedures while also attending to the rights of the individuals being assessed. This article examines the neuropsychological literature on extraneous influences in evaluations including effects of attorney presence. Then the article discusses the limited knowledge about attorney presence during forensic evaluations, addresses attorney motivations for being present during an evaluation, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    Ethical and Professional Demands for Forensic Mental Health Professionals in the Post-Atkins Era.Virginia A. Galloway & Stanley L. Brodsky - 2003 - Ethics and Behavior 13 (1):3-9.
    (2003). Ethical and Professional Demands for Forensic Mental Health Professionals in the Post-Atkins Era. Ethics & Behavior: Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3-9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark